I read the 3 Kennedy profiles so you don’t have to

December 21st, 2010 at 4:43 pm by under General Talk

Kennedy father and son in the Oval Office in 2008

When Congressman Patrick Kennedy retires at the end of this term and is succeeded by David Cicilline, it will mark the first time since 1946 that no Kennedy has been serving in Congress. That was the year JFK was first elected to a House seat in Massachusetts at the age of 29.

The combination of the Kennedy name and Patrick’s troubled personal life has proven irresistible to reporters, and over the past week three papers have published profiles of the 43-year-old: The New York Times (Thursday), The Boston Globe (Friday) and The Providence Journal (Sunday).

The articles clock in at a combined 4,947 words and each one covers some of the same ground. Since Nesi’s Notes is all about constituent service, here are the highlights from the three stories. I’d also recommend Globe columnist Brian McGrory’s reflections on Patrick from last winter.

His Future

Kennedy plans to remain a Rhode Islander and is keeping his Portsmouth farmhouse, which he either recently renovated (NYT) or is renovating (Globe). He also may keep an office in Washington. (NYT)

Kennedy’s memoir, “Coming Clean,” is set to be be published in late 2011 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. (NYT) Mary Ann Akers, a gossip columnist at The Washington Post, is his co-author. (Projo)

Kennedy’s next focus will be on promoting brain research, and he’s planning a brain research conference in Boston on May 25. He’s also set up a website, Moonshot.org, that compares the effort to JFK’s push to put a man on the moon. (NYT)

In another echo of his uncle, Kennedy calls neurology the “new frontier” of science. (Globe) He hopes he can “put together something like the American Cancer Society for brain research” (Globe), and thinks it could do a huge amount to help wounded veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

David Cicilline is going to take over Kennedy’s Capitol Hill apartment. (Globe, Projo) A Republican will get his old House office. (NYT)

His Legacy

Kennedy’s signature accomplishment as a lawmaker was the 2008 mental-health parity law, which requires insurers to treat mental and physical illnesses the same way. (NYT, Globe, Projo)

After initially voting in favor of the Iraq war – unlike his father and the rest of the Rhode Island delegation – Kennedy has now become a vocal opponent of the military effort in Afghanistan. (NYT, Globe, Projo)

Santa Monica City Councilman Bobby Shriver is the only Kennedy who currently holds political office. (NYT)

His Health

Kennedy thinks his highly publicized May 2006 car crash jolted him into acknowledging his addiction to prescription drugs and helped set him on the path to advocating for mental health issues. (Globe)

Kennedy has hired a “sober coach” to help him fight his addictions. The person “just checks in daily or weekly and ensures that you’re not isolating, not falling off the edge.” (Projo)

His Thinking

Kennedy says he never considered remaining out of politics because he was dead set on following in the path of his famous father, Ted. (NYT)

Kennedy’s dad was “the most important in my life,” but now he is “looking forward to developing those emotional relationships with others, because there’s more to life.” (NYT)

Kennedy says our February WPRI 12 poll showing he might face a tough reelection fight is not what caused him to retire, although he made the announcement shortly after it was released. (Globe)

Miscellany

The NYT and the Projo interviewed Kennedy at his office. The Globe’s Mark Arsenault – a former Projo scribe who wrote the Rhode Island Monthly piece which revealed Kennedy would not run again – got to go to his apartment, where he saw some open bags of potato chips. (Globe, NYT, Projo)

The Projo’s Washington bureau thinks this is the 112th Congress, but it’s actually the 111th. Whoops. (Projo)

Darrel West thinks the lack of Kennedys in office is “symbolic of the decline of liberalism” – an odd assertion the same year national health reform was enacted. (NYT)

The NYT’s profile had a pretty down feel to it, actually. “The Kennedys have been woven prominently through the political and social history of the last half-century,” the paper said, but then ticked off only bad things: two assassinations, Chappaquiddick and JFK Jr.’s plane crash. (NYT)

The Journal profile is the only one that mentions Kennedy’s feud with the Bishop of Providence and Scott Brown’s upset  to his father’s Senate seat. (Projo)

Like Jack Reed and Jim Langevin, Patrick Kennedy has an iPad. (Projo)

(Photograph: Eric Draper/White House)

Tags: , , , , ,

4 Responses to “I read the 3 Kennedy profiles so you don’t have to”

  1. *Darrel West thinks the lack of Kennedys in office is “symbolic of the decline of liberalism” – an odd assertion the same year national health reform was enacted. (NYT)*

    Wha? So if liberalism were not in decline, which Kennedy does Mr. West think would be in office now? I think the lack of Kennedys in office is rather related to the lack of Kennedys.

    Are there any Bushes in office right now? Clear sign of the decline of conservatism isn’t it?

    1. Ted Nesi says:

      Well, hey, I don’t know – maybe the lack of Clays and Harrisons in office is a sign of the decline of Whigism.

  2. John says:

    Nobody can argue with you there, Ted. I’d read a post lamenting the decline of the American Whigs, despite the success of the 1850 Compromise, if you’d care to write it.

    The lack of Kennedy’s is more “symbolic” than symptomatic of the decline of a certain era of liberalism. But it’s more like the end of a dynasty than the decline of an ideology.

    1. Ted says:

      Agreed, John. I think political dynasties have a lot more to do with internal family dynamics than any larger secular changes in politics; there were no Roosevelts in high office in the 1960s, I believe, yet that didn’t stop the Great Society. Contrariwise, the two Bush administrations didn’t necessarily represent a high-water mark for conservative governance.

      Plus, if Caroline Kennedy were now the junior senator from New York, would that really signal anything different about politics ca. 2012? Doubtful.

      Thanks for commenting!