Doherty has twice as much cash as Cicilline for race’s last leg

October 25th, 2012 at 10:46 pm by under Nesi's Notes, On the Main Site

Republican Brendan Doherty headed into the final three weeks of the general election campaign with a big financial advantage over incumbent Democratic Congressman David Cicilline as the two candidates’ spending passed $3 million combined.

Doherty’s campaign had $328,060 on hand as of Oct. 17, while Cicilline’s campaign had only $153,281 left, according to Federal Election Commission reports the candidates filed Thursday evening.

Cicilline raised more money than Doherty from Oct. 1 through Oct. 17, though not by much. The Democrat’s contributions totaled $121,058 while the Republican’s totaled $97,104, the FEC filings show.

Doherty’s campaign outspent his opponent’s during those two and a half weeks, however, spending $278,860 to Cicilline’s $208,739. Cicilline has spent $2.03 million since the start of 2011 fighting to keep his seat, while Doherty has spent $1.1 million in his bid to defeat the freshman lawmaker.

The bulk of Doherty’s outlays went to OnMessage Inc., his campaign consultants, which got $226,847 for producing and placing the Republican’s TV advertising. Cicilline’s top expense was $156,287 spent with Abar Hutton Media, which places his TV ads. Both OnMessage and Abar Hutton are based in Alexandria, Va.

Doherty’s latest crop of donors includes Lifespan CEO Timothy Babineau ($250), Taco CEO John Hazen White Jr. ($1,000), and the political action committees of Taco Bell ($1,000), McDonald’s ($2,500) and New Jersey Congressman Scott Garrett ($2,000). He also got $5,000 from the Republican National Committee and $3,500 from the National Republican Congressional Committee.

Cicilline’s list includes music industry titan Irving Azoff ($2,500), former Citizens Financial Group CEO Lawrence Fish ($2,000), Loews Hotels CEO Jonathan Tisch ($1,000), Capitol City Group lobbyists Christopher Vitale ($1,250) and Gerry Harrington ($1,000), Goldman Sachs’ top Washington lobbyist Michael Paese ($1,000), former Brown & Sharpe Chairman Henry Sharpe Jr. ($1,000) and Oscar-winning director James L. Brooks ($1,000).

Cicilline also received donations from the political action committees of Planned Parenthood ($5,000), U.S. Sen. Jack Reed ($3,500), Lockheed Martin ($3,000), Sony Pictures ($2,500), Amgen ($2,000), Alexion ($1,500), Massachusetts Congressman Ed Markey ($1,000) and Enterprise Rent-A-Car ($1,000), among others.

Cicilline has raised a total of $2.1 million this election cycle. Doherty has raised nearly $1.4 million.

A WPRI 12 poll last month showed Cicilline at 44%, followed by Doherty at 38% and independent David Vogel at 6%, with 10% of voters still undecided.

• Related: Newest Cicilline TV ad hits back at GOP on his legal career (Oct. 23)

Tags: , , ,

6 Responses to “Doherty has twice as much cash as Cicilline for race’s last leg”

  1. Nesi Nation says:

    Ted, you are missing one hell of a breaking story at the ProJo right now. Management changed its mind and will accept no pay cut concesssions…even though the Guild was working on a plan Instead, there will be layoffs before election day.

    Would suggest you call somebody soon.

  2. [...] Both party committees are investing significant resources in the 1st District, an unlikely situation in one of the nation’s most heavily Democratic districts that’s largely due to the fallout from Cicilline’s misleading 2010 comments about Providence’s finances. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is helping the Cicilline campaign pay for some of its final ads, as well, as the incumbent faces a cash shortage. [...]

  3. [...] Related: GOP to spend $280K on TV push (Oct. 26) | Doherty has twice Cicilline’s cash (Oct. 25) Tags: 1st Congressional District, brendan doherty, campaign 2012, david cicilline, NRCC, [...]

  4. [...] has more cash on hand to continue the air war,  but national Democrats are coming to Cicilline’s aid.  The best [...]

  5. Angella Balque says:

    Bruce Hoffman offers a fascinating and enlightening examination of the confusing nature of modern terrorism. I especially enjoyed the opening chapter on the toils of anyone trying to lay down a definition of the word “terrorism” itself. Overall, it is a must read for anyone trying to make heads or tails of today’s “new-generation” terrorism. I strongly recommend it!

  6. [...] who was at a significant financial disadvantage to Doherty as of Oct. 17, appears to be getting significantly more last-minute cash than his [...]