RI congressional delegation slams Obama over Social Security

April 10th, 2013 at 5:21 pm by under Nesi's Notes, On the Main Site

RI_delegation_bride_4-10-12_Lewis_SchulerPresident Obama isn’t getting any support from Rhode Island’s congressional delegation for his controversial proposal to trim future Social Security benefits.

All four Democrats – usually loyal defenders of the president – issued statements Wednesday criticizing Obama for his proposal to use a different measure of inflation, known as “chained CPI,” to calculate Social Security benefit increases, which would reduce payments over time compared with current law.

The harshest critique came from U.S. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a leading liberal in the chamber. “The so-called ‘chained CPI’ proposal included in President Obama’s budget is nothing more than a benefit cut disguised behind technical jargon,” he declared.

Whitehouse said he thinks the way Social Security currently calculates inflation already “shortchanges” senior citizens and should be changed to increase benefits – the exact opposite of Obama’s proposal. “I made a promise to the people of Rhode Island that I would always oppose cuts to Social Security, and I’m going to keep that promise,” Whitehouse said.

U.S. Sen. Jack Reed – who is up for re-election next year – called the Obama budget “a mixed bag,” saying: “I remain adamantly opposed to cutting Social Security and using accounting changes to reduce future cost-of-living increases as a means to reduce the deficit.”

Congressman Jim Langevin said Social Security “has kept millions out of poverty without adding to the debt, and I will continue to advocate for alternatives that would put it on sound footing for generations to come.”

Congressman David Cicilline said he was “disappointed” that Obama included the Social Security change in his budget, and suggested the program could be preserved “by reforming our tax code, ending subsidies for Big Oil, and making responsible, targeted spending cuts.”

The reaction may help explain why Republican Congressman Paul Ryan, usually an implacable Obama opponent, instead offered him rare – if limited – praise for the chained CPI proposal. “I think the president should be commended for leaning into an issue that is not popular,” Ryan told National Review.

Not every progressive is as adamantly opposed to chained CPI as Rhode Island’s congressional delegation is.

“There are legitimate reasons not to adopt the chained CPI, and many people who aren’t affluent would indeed be worse off,” Robert Greenstein, president of the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, wrote Tuesday. “At the same time, fears that the chained CPI would impose severe hardship are overblown, especially if policymakers accompany it with a robust package of protections and mitigating measures for those who are very old or have low incomes.”

The four Rhode Island Democrats’ reactions to the Obama budget weren’t entire negative; they praised other proposals, including the president’s call for additional tax increases on upper-income Americans and his proposed new spending on infrastructure projects.

But Reed said Social Security wasn’t the only problem he saw in the budget, arguing that “it falls short on other specific priorities, like LIHEAP” – the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program – “and weatherization.”

• Related: RI Dems back Obama on fiscal cliff deal despite concerns (Jan. 2)

(photo: Stephen Schuler/WPRI)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “RI congressional delegation slams Obama over Social Security”

  1. lost in ri says:

    these dopes… they fight over peanuts….the change to the average person is next to nothing….

    and then they spend billions on useless things.

  2. Nesis NOtObjective says:

    Maybe they should be slamming you for your biased reporting . . .what are you hoping to get a gig with Raimondo if she becomes Governor?

    WPRI won;t allow the link . .google it Forbes + Nesi

    You will see how biased Nesi is, you are an embarressment ot this State.

  3. Bob says:

    nesi notobjective = uniontool iam.
    typical screeching angry unionists!

  4. Nesis NOtObjective says:

    ok bob – Forbes is pro business, anti-government, uber-capitalist magazine (I read it every month and invest occasionally because of it). .. yet you call me a unionist??? No, I despise unions . .yet I also despise cheesebag politicians and want-to-be (wannabe to you) media types that run around acting like they are for the greater good when all they are is for themselves and more of the same typical wall street greed. Did you read the article . . .I doubt you reading ability exceeds a 4th grade level. Get out of mommys basement and get a real job I guarantee I pay more in annual taxes than you make in a year. Like I said google Nesi + Forbes . .decide for yourseld . .and screehy Bob can continue use his “Electronic benefits card” to buy his groceries. . .courtesy of me and other working people . . Bob is probably NEsi LOL

  5. Eric says:

    Guess after 4-5 years, poeple, even democrats, are seeing thru Obama’s BS.

    Guess he’ll have to make his cool-aid stronger….

  6. [...] 3. Two dispatches from Washington, this time on the House side from Jim Langevin and David Cicilline. By a vote of 411-3, Langevin got an amendment added to the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act that changed the word “local” to “political subdivision” in a section about power plants’ cybersecurity, which he described as a way of “allowing more utilities to receive the protections built into our bill.” Rhode Island’s pair split over the final vote on the cyber bill: Langevin voted for it, Cicilline voted against it. Meanwhile, the latter is already making a mark in his new perch on the House Budget Committee. This week Cicilline joined with the panel’s powerful ranking Democrat, Chris Van Hollen, and sent a letter to House Speaker John Boehner pressuring him to convene a formal conference committee to hash out the chamber’s  differences with the Senate over the budget. Cicilline also made The New York Times with his resolution opposing “chained CPI.” [...]