How Rhode Island’s elite is like Ireland’s (not in a good way)September 16th, 2013 at 11:55 am by Ted Nesi under Nesi's Notes, On the Main Site
The Washington Post’s Steve Pearlstein recently published a long piece on the troubled Irish economy. Yet some of the complaints Pearlstein passed along about Ireland’s political and business elite echoes a lot of the criticisms of Rhode Island’s ruling class – particularly this section (emphasis added):
Reading through the postings from abroad at “Emigration Nation,” it’s clear the expats aren’t merely discouraged by the lack of jobs back home, but frustrated by a political and economic establishment they view as insular, unresponsive and incapable of carrying out fundamental reform of the country’s outdated institutions. …
Time and again it was described to me as a system characterized by mediocrity, nepotism, secrecy and a lack of genuine competition. It is a system in which the governing philosophy of “social partnership” has morphed into nothing more than an excuse for buying off special interests. And it is a system in which the top priority of those who run it is preserving their powers, perks and prerogatives.
In a new book, “The Fall of the Celtic Tiger,” economists Donal Donovan and Antoin Murphy … argue that the root cause of the crisis was “the absence of sufficient questioning and internal debate” within a political, economic and media establishment too easily prone to “wearing of the green jersey.” That comfortable consensus and cheerleading culture stifled serious analysis or criticism of what was really going on during the boom years. A stubborn “lack of transparency in the political decision making process,” they write, undermined the political legitimacy of the government’s response to the crisis.
Some of this is pretty standard “politicians are the worst!” stuff that you hear regardless of whether you’re talking about elites in Dublin, Providence, Washington, Boston or Tokyo. But the trenchant critique of Irish elites reported by Pearlstein sounds uncomfortably similar to what we see in Providence.
Agree? Disagree? And if you do agree, how do you change it?